Home > Inventions > A machine that breaks the laws of physics

A machine that breaks the laws of physics

September 17th, 2010        

A machine that breaks the laws of physics

A Wells inventor has put together a machine that he claims is the first step in creating free energy from perpetual motion. He says it produces more power than it consumes. However the patent office will not register the design – because if it works, it breaks the laws of physics.

The machine, which basically shaped out of leftover bicycle parts and a windscreen-washer motor, uses high-powered magnets and a series of flywheels to seemingly create energy from gravity. The outcome, only a tiny amount of power is provided by the washer motor, using a rubber band cut from a bicycle inner tube. The flywheels keep turning even though it would seem unbearable for the motor to move the weight of the machine.

A machine that breaks the laws of physics

The anonymous designer says that it is the design of the magnets and the flywheels that make it work. What’s more, he claims a commercial version of the invention, around the same size as a washing machine, could produce enough power to run a house, virtually free of charge and could be fitted anywhere without the need for a power source, which would make it invaluable in isolated locations, like the North and South pole.

Each flywheel would become its own electricity generator, and he says that to make more power all that is need is to add more rotors. Now what would happen if I throw in say, a thousand rotors? Anyway, the designer said that the Alpha Omega Galaxy Freefall Generator (AOFGF) is a different eco-friendly way of producing electricity.

A machine that breaks the laws of physics

“The system functions as a large flywheel. Power can be generated without bio-hazards which in turn produce no harmful by-products. A small amount of external input is required to activate and control the system.”

“This can be provided from any source such as battery, solar power or hydro power. Once operating, the external energy input can be supported by power generated and harnessed from the system itself.”

“It does not need to be stationary in order to function and therefore can also be used to power, or support the powering of any type of water vessel, land vehicle or aviation machine; it can provide a solution for most energy requirements.”

The designer claims that adoption of the AOGFG to produce energy for heating, lighting and power would drastically reduce emissions. Lower energy costs would be incurred by companies lowering overall production costs therefore allowing an increase in production and enable companies to become more globally competitive.

He added: “We have already received keen interest from companies in the Far East and Europe, but would prefer for the initial production of these innovative products to benefit the UK. We are still in the early stages, and hope that local UK based manufacturing companies will be interested and approach us with a view to helping bring these products to market.”

“Clean energy offers significant economic benefits. From manufacturing development to the support of related industries, clean energy builds new economic opportunities and creates a significant number of local jobs.”

Its designer is looking for a supplier of low speed generator units suitable for use with the machine and precision engineers with the skills needed to create the components needed to improve the machines efficiency.

While the patent office will register different parts of the AOGFG, they won’t allow the machine as a complete item to be patented. Because it is claimed it produces more energy than it consumes, it is considered to be a perpetual motion machine which is the holy grail of scientists the world over.

The patent office will not allow patents on perpetual motion machines as they break the first law of thermodynamics. This states that energy can be changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed.

Engineers all over the world have created machines that they claim to break this law – the machines, gathered together under the title Over Unity devices, appear to create their own power. But so far no-one has been able to produce a machine that, as well as appearing to power itself, can power anything else.

The Wells Journal has seen the machine in action, and it does appear to work. The tiny motor should not be powerful enough to keep the machine turning once it is started with a light push – but it does… Magical? Absolutely. Even the Protoss doesn’t have such technology.

SOURCE via this is somerset

Author:
 
  • http://TurboFool.com TurboFool

    Oh, gee, we’ve never seen this before. I’m sure this one won’t turn out like the hundreds of similar devices throughout history that were proven either to be hoaxes or proven in the end NOT to produce more energy than was put into them and, in fact, did require more energy than they output.

    In this case while the mechanism seems to be something clever to efficiently use the energy from that tiny motor to do a bunch of whiz-bang movement, that very whiz-bang movement is what allows it to maintain that movement. You can’t turn that movement into energy that could be used by another device without canceling it out entirely.

    Essentially what’s been made here is a pretty, exciting spinny-thing that spins dramatically from a small amount of energy. Nothing more, probably nothing less.

    As well the whole section about the patent office refusing to patent devices that break the first law of thermodynamics is bull. The patent office has merely gotten so sick of the MASSIVE number of proposals for these types of machines that they’ve put a rule into place that devices that fit within the description of perpetual motion must be demonstrated with a working device. All this anonymous inventor need do is demonstrate it to the patent office and they’ll patent it. Doesn’t sound difficult if this is legitimate.

  • Tim Bob

    @TurboFool

    TurboFool I totally agree, at this stage the device in question is nothing more than a strange looking spinny-thing that is said to produce more energy than is put in.

    However let’s give the inventor a little breathing room shall we? I mean before we completely dismiss his efforts let’s take a moment to congratulate him and others for at the very least having a go.

    In my humble opinion there is no such thing as a bad idea, and in this day and age with all the problems we have I actually admire those that decide to go in a different direction. It may well be that one day one of these crazy devices is actually proven to work and work well. I personally see no harm in it and in fact think we can only benefit from it.

    Yes the chances of this thing working as described are very small, but then the chances of you and I even being born were very small as well!

  • http://TurboFool.com TurboFool

    @Tim Bob My issue’s honestly not with the inventor, who I take to be someone who likely believes in what they’re doing. Very lone inventors in their own basement put this much time, money, and effort into inventing something just to fool the public, especially when they’ll be found out too quickly. It happens, but usually these people have an idea and run with it and believe when they make progress that they’re working their way to reaching their goal. I know I came up with an idea for one of these years ago and was sure it would work until I learned not only why it couldn’t, but how many people before me had used essentially the exact same technique I had come up with, and failed in the same ways. But without people like this willing to try, we’d never know.

    I’m bugged by the continually credulous reporting of stories like this, where people take it at face value, take the claims as serious, make statements that it breaks the laws of physics, that it’s somehow different from all the others, but fail to understand what went into all those other contraptions that are the reason they failed, and how this one appears to not actually be different in the end. I’m not saying don’t report it, and I’m not saying report it as “here’s another stupid loon who believes he can break the laws of physics and clearly he can’t,” I’m just saying report it with reference to where it fits into the scheme, and the fact that at this stage it remains to be seen whether there’s any legitimacy to it. Give us the history, give us the facts, and RESEARCH THE CLAIMS being made by the person. When he says he can’t patent it because the patent office won’t patent anything that breaks the first law of thermodynamics, don’t just print that blindly, see if it’s even TRUE. Make a modicum of effort to fact-check the story before you print it. And when you witness it, don’t make bold claims that you’ve “seen it work so clearly it does” without doing the research to find out how many times that same phrase has been said about every such device in history before it was proven not to work. Perspective and credibility are all I’m asking for.

  • Hrithikrshn3

    As a designer looking for suppliers of low speed generators suitable for use in aircraft and precision engineering skills necessary to create the components needed to improve the efficiency of the machines.

    SEO Friendly Press Release

  • Diyajee3

    At least for them, explains, which is why spa parties are popular. If you have a girl T-Shirt in your home, a weekend at Canyon Ranch with one or two friends or a relaxing day at a spa where fashion is the new local

    early signs of
    pregnancy

  • Byzehr 111

    This generator is one of a variant of generator of Jacob
    Bitsadze, wich has been invented in 1998. It can be looked on a link:

    http://contest.techbriefs.com/machinery-and-equipment-2011/1653-fuel-less-motor-generator-for-electric-car

     

    Mr. Amarsingam  uses hinged
    cargoes instead of a flywheel. But it does not change essence of the invention.
    The principle of a difference of radiuses which was open by J. Bitsadze is besides used. This theory can be looked on a link:

     

    http://technogeo.ucoz.com/load/the_latent_weight_result_of_a_spin_of_a_massive_body_and_a_sourse_of_superfluous_energy/1-1-0-1

     

    web-site:
    http://technogeo.ucoz.com/

     

    The same principle is used  in the generator of Chas Chambell too.